When my libertarian friends
railed against the FCC’s seizing authority over the Internet right before
Christmas, I honestly didn’t get what all of the fuss was about. In the aftermath of the tragedy in Tucson, I get it. I really
get it.
Imagine if Saturday’s shooting
would have occurred in Internet-less world.
The Sheriff would have linked the shooter to the Tea Party, and the
mainstream media would run with it, embellishing the narrative to include Sarah
Palin, talk radio, Arizona’s
immigration law, racism, and efforts to repeal the health care mandate and all
the other crazy stuff that got thrown on the pile last Saturday in the world
series of bullshit.
CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC, New
York Times, Washington Post, L.A. Times, AP, Reuters – the media would report
the Palin causal connection as fact, while the opinion pages would describe the
tea parties as Klan rallies held in ammo dumps.
Columnists and Congressmen would demand new prohibitions on guns,
speech, association, and privacy, and legislatures would eagerly comply with
hurried legislation in response to the clear and present danger posed by a
“vast right-wing conspiracy” whose 20 Arizona
victims are just the tip of the coming iceberg.
It is now quite clear that the Tucson narrative fabricated
by the left was entirely wrong; ideology played no part in this tragic shooting
whatsoever. Rather, an individual who
was mentally ill set out to avenge a perceived personal slight when he tried to
assassinate a Congresswoman for not adequately answering his previously asked question
about grammar and word meanings.
But why do we know that? How did we come too learn the truth that it
was a psychotic obsession with the meaning of words, and not our “toxic tone” in
political debate that caused 20 people to be shot? The Internet, that’s how we know; that is the
only reason we know. The same Internet
that the Government will soon censor, license, regulate, and monitor your usage
of – the FCC’s Internet.
We did not learn the truth of Tucson
from major news outlets, editorial writers, civic leaders, elected officials,
law enforcement, President, or Secretary of State, all of whom either parroted
the lie or only begrudgingly acknowledged facts that others had discovered and
tweeted, shared, reposted, and liked.
No, we learned the truth of Tucson from Youtube,
MySpace, Facebook, Twitter, texting, and from thousands of bloggers who exposed
the tea-party-did-it narrative as a vindictive partisan fraud within hours of its
transparently coordinated launch.
Unfazed, MSM outlets continued to
promote the big lie for days later, easily traversing the declining ethical
half-lives that separate speculation from denial from deception from propaganda
from delusion. As of this writing, they
remain in a delusional state – trapped in a fantasy world of their own making where
millions of tea-bots lurk locked-and-loaded and waiting for the fillings in
their molars to vibrate with the low frequency signal from Palin and Beck to
open fire.
Do you realize how close we came
to our own American Kristallnacht? If
the FCC had already developed its capability to block content – as it aims to
do - which of the two Tucson narratives do you think would be suppressed in the
name of “net neutrality”: the statist party line wherein Sarah Palin and the
tea party caused a massacre, or the alternative where a drug abusing mentally
ill loner tried to kill a Congresswoman over an inadequate answer to his
concern about grammar? When the
bandwidth is prioritized by FCC, will you read about Tucson at Dr. Tim’s Moment of Clarity or Paul
Krugman’s Daily Dose of Donkey Dung?
We would never know he was an
atheist, a lunatic, a loner, a left-inspired anarchist drop-out with a history
of violent threats and unstable impulses.
We would know only what the government propagandist wants us to know –
tea party did it. They would photoshop a
Gadsden Flag hat on that bald head in his mug shot. It would be a blatant lie, a slander of the
most despicable sort, a reckless smear whose sole purpose is to create the
illusion of crisis requisite to convince the American people to cede more of
our liberty to a government whose appetite for control is insatiable.
This is not paranoid speculation;
we have just witnessed the new depths to which the left will sink to achieve
their aims. For days now, we have read
for ourselves the statist narrative that would have gone uncontroverted but for
a free and unregulated Internet. It is
one thing for members of the media to jump to a wrong conclusion in a panic;
such indiscretions are forgivable in the age of instant news and analysis.
But it is quite another to
participate in a sustained coordinated campaign to distort, suppress, and
misrepresent the truth. Not just some,
but all of the major news outlets participated in the Tucson “toxic tone” conspiracy. None of them – not one – has apologized for
the bile and invective they cast about and the character assassinations they
unleashed without a scintilla of evidence to justify their charges.
It is because they have no
remorse, no shame, no integrity. That is
why they are broke and failing, no other reason. They are not sorry for what they have done,
and they will not be, because they believe their ends justify any means. They do not see that they have done wrong;
only that it did not work; thwarted again by the Internet and the millions of
freethinkers who use it. These are the kind
of people who go to work at FCC when their papers close down; regulating that Internet
that ruined their cushy lives to insure it fits the correct statist notion of
“neutrality”.
Now that we know what that term
will mean shortly, Jerod Louchner’s bizarre question to Congresswoman Giffords
is positively chilling: “what is government if words have no meaning?” And here, my friends, is the adequate answer
to his question: it is force - raw,
brute, pure force. Fight back.
“Moment Of Clarity” is a weekly commentary by Libertarian
writer and speaker Tim Nerenz, Ph.D. Visit Tim’s website www.timnerenz.com to find your moment and
order his new book, “Tooth Fairy Government.”
These are the kind of people who go to work at FCC when their newspapers go bankrupt; regulating that Internet that ruined their cushy lives to insure it fits the correct statist notion of “neutrality”.
ReplyDelete