February 09, 2012

Unbeatable

Let’s cut to the chase. 

Gingrich is dropping faster than Bill Clinton’s drawers at an intern convention.  After six years hard at it, Romney has not inspired one single Mitt-bot.  Santorum is everyone’s second choice – he’s the guy that the girl in your home town settled for when the dude that gave her the tingles hopped on his Harley and disappeared out west.  And of course there is my man Ron Paul - interloper from the Peace and Freedom Party, fighting the hate since ’88.  

It would behoove the GOP’s final four to quit field-gutting each other, because the only way that President Obama wins re-election is if disgruntled libertarians, or social conservatives, or establishment republicans, or tea partiers or single-issue activists boycott the winner of the Republican primary contests. 

That five-part coalition of the willing is the unbeatable team; so the answer to Obama is to give each anti-Obama faction the chance to vote for someone who shares their values - on the same ticket.  Which ever faction’s favorite son wins should pick a running mate that the losing factions absolutely adore. 

And my suggestion for that unbeatable ticket is President Ron Paul and Vice President Allen West.  Stop laughing.   

Think about it.  What voter anywhere to the right of Hugo Chavez can't find a good reason to punch the Paul/West chad all the way through with gusto?  To all my conservative friends who say they like Ron Paul on most things but can’t bring themselves to vote for him because of this or that, I say ok, don't vote for him then - vote for his Vice President instead. 

What’s your problem with Ron Paul – that he’s supposedly racist?  Hello, Allen West.  Anti-Israel?  Shalom, Allen West.  Soft on Defense?  Make that Col. West, pal.  Too old?  Allen West, youngster.  Meandering answers? Allen-get-the-hell-out-West.  Appeaser?  Allen-obliterate-them-West.  Too Muslim-tolerant?  Allen-pee-on-‘em-twice-West.  You get the picture.

And to all my libertarian friends who are still breathing into a bag at the thought of Col. West standing next to our icon, I say that I, too, could list a dozen policy disagreements with the conservative Rep. West.  But if conservative Vice President Allen West is what it takes to elect libertarian President Ron Paul, then the Colonel overcomes my lesser objections by the score of 1-12.  As an MOC reader comment recently reminded us – politics isn’t religion, and compromise is not a mortal sin.   

Every poll shows that independents and Democrats will come over to Ron Paul in numbers that no other Republican can match.  Young people, who will set voting patterns for life, flock to the old geezer in droves - and they bring enthusiasm with them.  A Paul-West ticket does not simply motivate a conservative/libertarian base; it pulls voters away from key demographic blocks ceded to Obama by the professional vote-herders.

Seriously, a Paul/West pairing is a 60-40 hammering waiting to happen.  Throw in the re-election Wisconsin of Governor Scott Walker and the taking of the U.S. Senate and the Government Party may never recover.  

Let’s face it - there will be no defeat of President Obama this fall without some serious nose-holding.  This is the reality that is settling in upon all of us who understand that losing the battle for the lesser of two evils this time will mean a lot more evil than normal. 

In Barack Obama’s post-Constitutional America, the idea of a second term without the restraint of a re-election bid drops a Paul/West ticket down to a distant second place in the rankings of the unthinkable.  

What are the alternatives?  A Romney/Gingrich ticket seems less likely with each kick to the groin.  A Ron Paul/Gary Johnson pairing would thrill libertarians but alienate the much larger voting block of conservatives.  Romney/Huntsman locks up the Mormon millionaire vote, but Axlerod wasn’t going to waste a stamp on them anyway.  And Paul/Paul runs the American Chopper risk – waycool junior might upstage the original badass daddy.    

But either Paul or Romney could instantly assemble the unbeatable coalition by adding a rock-star running mate from the losing faction to the ticket.  If the mere thought of Paul/West triggers your vertigo, think about Romney selecting Rand Paul and you will achieve a similar, if far less entertaining, result.  The only purpose of choosing a running mate is to win, and winning back rivals' supporters alienated in this primary fight is the most important decision the GOP nominee will make.  

Conservatives and libertarians agree on the most fundamental of binary political choices – government or liberty – and we need each other to defeat the Government Party, and I mean both its Democrat and Republican franchises.   

The only reason we know what an unlikely pairing Ron Paul and Allen West would be is that they are quite likely the two most honest, straight-talking, principled politicians in the nation.  That alone is the margin of victory when 1/3 of the voters self-identify as independents.  An independent voter is a Republican or Democrat who got tired of playing sucker; honesty is a pretty big deal with us.   

And just imagine the sound bites generated by these two; they would dominate the news every single day of the campaign, neutralizing the President’s single most important advantage – a cheerleading mainstream media.  And the schooling of both incumbents in the fall debates would be simply awesome.  Biden: “I’ve been to Iraq 6 times and…”  West interrupts, “shoot any of ‘em, Joe?  No? Wuss.”   Chris Matthews would pass out and Wolf Blitzer would hurl.  Television worth watching. 

Well, that’s my Dream Team – got a better one?  That’s what the comment section is for, so let’s hear it.


“Moment Of Clarity” is a weekly commentary by Libertarian writer and speaker Tim Nerenz, Ph.D.  Visit Tim’s website www.timnerenz.com to find your moment and order Tim’s new book, “BRING IT!”     

18 comments:

  1. Make it a brokered convention.....
    West and Ryan, or Ron Johnson, or Rubio, or Christie, or Mitchell.....The future looks GREAT!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. There is a question you haven't answered here: Is either of them qualified to be president? (That is not to say Obama was, or is now, qualified to be president.) I don't think being a congressman or a senator makes you qualified to be president. Being a governor does. (Which is not to say I'll be voting for Romney either: http://steveprestegard.com/2012/02/09/nones-of-the-above/ ‎)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Never heard of West but the Issues page on his website reveals that he believes little Iran might be a threat and that little Israel is our friend. I don't think so.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'd vote to see that.

    ReplyDelete
  5. And in a nutshell, Libertarian Unitarian explains why Ron Paul has no shot. I do agree with a lot of what Paul has to say...even on foreign policy. But to stick your head in the sand about the world is idiotic. "Little" Iran? Japan was pretty little too. Heck, Germany is tiny compared to the USA. Paul is a leader of the Neville Chamberlain type.

    ReplyDelete
  6. What are the "qualifications" for president anyway. The current occupant of the White House waas (is) proably the LEAST "qualified" to ever have run and he proves it every day. He got elected on looks, a speech and skin color, not on the content of the speech - or on that of his character. As for voting for the veep, that was the case in the last election. The veep was the more attractive candidate - in EVERY way, I might add.

    "...wuss". Great line, Tim!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm playing the authors favs... Paul/Cain... gives you the same fire power, but slightly less empire building, and I think Cain can be coached on the FED. Puts Cain in drivers seat in 2016,, but he can always pick up Rand for VP then. Any other choice,, and I'm voting Obama.. let us all suffer "fairly".

    ReplyDelete
  8. Dynasty - nice play, Tom! 1 term RP, 2 terms new and improved HC, and then 2 terms of RP2. 20 years of de-tax-ifying ought to do the trick.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Does it really matter? Romney will get the nod and it won't matter who he picks as a VP, the Obamanation will win again. I guess I'll just have to set my hopes on a 2016 Christie/Walker ticket.....

    ReplyDelete
  10. It is really disturbing that something like this is not going to happen. Why is it not possible to even get a true libertarian as VP, I wonder? Perhaps a possibility that may actually occur would be Romney/Paul. Perhaps people could get on board with a hard lined #2 but a fresh faced yes man at #1.

    What do you think?

    ReplyDelete
  11. www.facebook./vote4turner

    ReplyDelete
  12. Tim - Great idea, if only half right: Allen West. He'd make a great VP, but would never pair himself with Ron Paul, or vice versa. Who would call the shots re: defense issues in that administration? But your point about choosing the right VP is critical. In fact, despite what the political pundits say about VPs, I believe the choice of the VP will determine whether Obama wins or loses. I think Allen West would be an excellent pairing with Romney, giving his ticket balance and balls; and I think anyone who gets Marco Rubio on his ticket would be unbeatable. But as for Ron heading the ticket, I'm afraid that's a bridge too far. Great column, though, as usual. Look forward to them every week.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Love it! Way cool Junior and badass daddy, LOL. Once again, a brilliant piece and another one I wholeheartedly agree with.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I'm assuming that Romney gets the nomination, so I'm suggesting a Mitt-Romney/Rand-Paul ticket, and I'll hold my nose on the Romney half..

    ReplyDelete
  15. Ummm...No way in hell. Ron Paul is a freaking lunatic. Maybe even more crazy than Obama.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I still think we need to kick it old school and elect a president and vice president on seperate tickets. This will force a divided nation to work together better then having a house of one party a president of another. The fact that this nation is tolarating Obama has me scared silly all the while our state is attempting to dethrone Walker for no reason other then they don't like him. The fact that we have become a society of people who tolerate childish acts and presidents who bring us down is going to be tougher to clean up then anything Carter ever could have done. Of course we have the conservative options we do is a miracle in itself. The only possible way to recover from Obama is to get through Romney. Its like baby steps. After Romney, hopefully we can have a full blooded conservative in.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I like alan west. Doc, according to your estimation, where do his politics stand according to SOUND economic theory and constitutional governance? I understand little of macro economics (failed it in "regular" college, aced it, sin-effort, in community college) and would appreciate a trusted informed opinion.

    ReplyDelete

Be nice, be civil, or be gone - those are the rules. Comments are allowed for registered users, so make me glad I turned them back on, ok? .

Thanks - Dr. Tim